Smack Me and Spank Me
When does applying pressure to a child mean discipline? When any pressure is applied to anything it is an event occuring from a cause of action. Causation. Lawyers cannot challenge this because this is not a case trial and the only relevance here as Einstein would say is a “relative” within in superlative.
I don’t understand why people would initially want to “lay” pressure to the physical body of a little child. My children are not angels – they are my treasures.
Where is the right of passage? passed the age of solutions? or just an unmatured brain in the body of an adult? Look at the image displayed here – that is abuse in itself, it is violence. I wonder what my children would “think” of this?
When force is laid upon a child the nature of the hand applying it is trauma to the gene absorption locators in the brain. It is a criminal act.
The hand that lays pressure to that of any child is projecting their own frustration. Which is a mental health problem – wouldn’t you think? I mean “hello!” it is not a physical problem is it. Even a spastic person wouldn’t be able to enable this kind of action without a pre-supposed notion.
To dis-associate the personal self and enact feelings of anger upon another is just way weird – and I am no saint, however I do not consider spanking a form of discipline – it’s a quick fix to a method in irrationalism, depression and life-time disorder problems.
The reverse to be a true association with the receiver of the spank. One whom is spanked is – usually the one whom requires some connection via communication. Instead received the “wrong type” of connection and cops dejection via negative attention. However, the child doesn’t know this because behaviour associates itself with re-action. “Oh I did this and I got physically touched”. I do this and that happens; it aint rocket science. No wonder the great thinkers in time almost burst their brains trying to dissolve the mundane.
In Australia today, our Government pays $4.2 Million a year on Sex Offenders. Is there a link? I am sure one would only need to go to Centrelink to find out that if you are homeless you get “more” for your dollar. Why? there are incentives to every “state of being” it just depends what you choose to accept as the “quality” of the state of “your life” – or! how quality is measured depending upon what the daily requirements are!
Why doesn’t the Government pay more to the Services offered by the Mental Health Sector? the pyramid is upside down. That is why the weakest point is at the highest “point of destruction” in society. If people in power used their head – then; maybe the Country/Planet would get ahead!
For the end is sick. Forensic. Humanity ignores the signs. Look at the sign asking for help hanging from her neck. It’s just an image! – yea right! a war cry!
Lightening will strike like a bomb in the framework of the ones responsible for the admission of funds to the populational sector that deserves finance.
I am only sharing common values that I thought were goals. “See See You” is a way of saying Community Care Units require liquid funding now – that is only 1 area of desperate need. It’s time for action.
